Search for: "United States v. Lamp"
Results 1 - 20
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 7:50 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
We have also used such conductors or burners of various shapes, such as pieces with their lower ends secured to their respective supports, and having their upper ends united so as to form an inverted V-shaped burner. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm
The district court explained that the Paterson lamp was designed and built by the Paterson Institute in the United Kingdom in the early to mid-1990’s and that five articles describing the Paterson lamp were published in the United States, but there was no evidence that the lamp was ever sold, used, or exhibited in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:48 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:00 am
As the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently noted in Bruce Munro and Bruce Munro Studio v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm
United States, 254 F. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:13 am
”Columbia East v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
Shea blogged here about State v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:00 am
The case, Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:32 pm
United States, which involves the tariff classification of artificial candles in the form of tea lights and candles. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:00 am
The case, Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:47 am
United Rentals, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2011) considered several questions left unanswered in Pineda v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 11:31 am
United States, Customs has decided to revoke the earlier ruling and classify the merchandise in Heading 9018 as instruments and appliances used in medical, surgical, dental or veterinary sciences . . . . [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
This case, originally filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on claims of patent infringement, was brought on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
4 May 2018, 7:21 am
Not long after the Ninth Circuit issued its decision, Lamps Plus filed a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
Glukhin V. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:46 am
Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:39 am
See Aptix Corp. v. [read post]
