Search for: "United States v. Lang" Results 141 - 160 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 Yet, it is important to keep in mind that such claim changes are not effective until the proceeding is concluded.This past Monday in Keung Tse v. eBay, Inc., et al (CAND), the Court considered whether cancellation/amendment  of a claim during patent reexamination mooted an otherwise justiciable dispute, explaining: Only claim 21 of United States patent number 6,665,797 is asserted in this action. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 The post primarily focused on a dispute originating from the California state court, Lockwood v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In a case of “turnabout is fair play,” last Friday, a United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut considered, and disregarded, the USPTO’s reexamination analysis of the same prior art in Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Another potentially significant wild card is the Lingamfelter v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Silver of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona denied a motion to exclude evidence of the patent reexamination of the ’894 patent-in-suit in Integrated Technology Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
An example of such art would be secret public use of a claimed method that predated a patent filing, such as described in Metallizing Engineering Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am by New Books Script
26 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 4 from 2012: HV 9950 D35 2011 Criminal justice in the United States, 1789-1939 / Elizabeth Dale. [read post]