Search for: "United States v. Laughlin" Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 2-3, n. 1. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 And so the Fifth Circuit struck the GFSZA down.The Fifth Circuit’s opinion was subsequently vindicated by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:31 am by Harry Styron
Filed under: Missouri law, Ozarks Tagged: Exclusive jurisdiction, Government, Habeas corpus, Law, Missouri Supreme Court, United States, United States Constitution, United States Supreme Court [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:04 am
United States (1935), President Franklin D. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IAM) Lost knowledge (IP Spotlight) Nobel Prize winning physicist R B Laughlin explains how IP damages innovation (Techdirt) US v China IP case before the World Trade Organisation - differing news on who won or lost (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Chinese Law Prof Blog) WIPO Assemblies conclude (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch)       Global – Trade Marks / Brands   Trade mark marking strategy - R and TM… [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCRIMINAL PRACTICENo Reversible Error in Decision Not to Re-Sentence Pursuant to 'Crosby' After Remand United States, appellee v. [read post]