Search for: "United States v. Laurent" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 2:45 pm
Nick was joined by Christina Martin, a senior attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation who argued the case to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:04 pm by Matthew David Brozik
 — a case about colored outsoles of high-end ladies’ footwear — the Honorable Victor Marrero of the United States District Court for the Southern [...] [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm by Catherine M. Clayton
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm by Catherine M. Clayton
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm by Michael Atkins
No. 3376197; it’s been on the books in the United States since January 2008, with a claimed priority date of March 8, 2006. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
He registered the red lacquered outsole as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 2008. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 8:20 pm by Lindsey Harriman
  Yves Saint Laurent is a unit of Paris-based PPR, which owns Gucci and other luxury brands. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
 The United States Patent and Trademark Office does not register trademarks it considers aesthetically functional. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm by Valerie Oosterveld
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Kaster) (hsj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2009)United States v. [read post]