Search for: "United States v. Laws" Results 241 - 260 of 68,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had to grapple with the question of “whether the compelled use of Payne’s thumb to unlock his phone was testimonial,” the ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm by Mark Ashton
Scott & Anor v Scott | [1913] AC 417 | United Kingdom House of Lords | Judgment | Law | CaseMine In a lengthy footnote, the dissent parses the majority’s conclusion and citations related to divorce being open to public scrutiny. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm by Jon Brodkin
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had to grapple with the question of "whether the compelled use of Payne's thumb to unlock his phone was testimonial," the ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
  The bill would reauthorize Section 702 – the controversial law that allows the U.S. government to acquire communications of non-Americans outside the United States without a warrant – and make a range of changes to FISA overall. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:31 am by Famighetti & Weinick
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in the case Muldrow v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am by Dennis Crouch
The court held that under the Copyright Act, “United States copyright law protects only works of human creation” and found no basis to conclude that copyright extends to works generated autonomously by AI without human involvement. [read post]