Search for: "United States v. Legg" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Benefiting from an intervening Supreme Court ruling decided in 2015, Young v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 3:59 am
If the interested person seeks the prior option, the agency must refer the request to the applicable United States Attorney, who then files a complaint for forfeiture in federal district court, per 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
During the marriage, Husband changed employers and went to work for Legg Mason as a stock broker. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:43 pm
Di significativa rilevanza è infine l’introduzione della cosiddetta “clausola di supremazia”, che consente alla legge dello Stato, su proposta del Governo, di intervenire in materie di competenza regionale a tutela dell’unità giuridica o economica della Repubblica o dell’interesse nazionale. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
In the United States District Court, only a few judges (Chasanow, Motz, Bennett, Legg, Blake, Davis, Quarles) regularly direct that their opinions be posted. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:43 am by Green Building Law Brief
Capital Development, LLC, Case No. 1:09-cv-00632-BEL in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am by Nora Freeman Engstrom, Robert L. Rabin
Legg, the California Supreme Court established bystander liability for emotional distress, and, the same year, in Rowland v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
Alliance Resources Corp., a punitive damage award of $10,000,000 in a West Virginia slander of title case was upheld by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]