Search for: "United States v. Libby" Results 1 - 20 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2007, 5:02 pm
United States highlights the awkwardness of mootness doctrine itself. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:43 am
"  In this excerpt, Loftus describes her testimony in a pretrial hearing in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 3:18 pm
United States Leaves More Open Than it Answers PRIMARY MATERIALS Sentencing Memoranda Submitted in US v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
" Ordinarily, courts decide for themselves what a statute means, after hearing from counsel on both sides; in the Libby case, Libby is on one side, the United States on the other; the President is not a party. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 6:56 pm
United States (argued in the Supreme Court by TalkLeft blogger TChris), the guidelines were mandatory. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:03 pm
  Presumably the power exists partly to balance out the power of prosecutors gone wild, especially when they have gone wild on officers trying to carry out the foreign policy of the United States, albeit by way of cooking up a stupid story (apparently). [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court has held that Morrison v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:47 pm
United States, which President Bush supported, and the President's decision to commute Scooter Libby's prison sentence. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:31 am
    The government filed a petition for mandamus in the Ninth United States Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the ruling. [read post]