Search for: "United States v. Lieu"
Results 21 - 40
of 707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 1:12 am
8thCirc.jpg As long as a proper foundation is establish, a party may introduce photographs of tangible objects (a box of ammunition, identification cards with the defendant's name, and an electronic scale), which had been seized and destroyed before trial, instead of the objects themselves, in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 8:18 am
In Garcia v Galicia, 2019 WL 4197611 (D. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:37 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:22 am
In lieu of ratification, these states may “accede” to the Convention. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Sti. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
Alternatively, the developer could comply with the IHO by paying an in-lieu fee not to exceed the difference between the price of a market rate and affordable housing unit or dedicating land. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:40 am
In Londano v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 1934043, (D. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:55 am
On October 16, 2012 petitioner filed a Motion for an Order to the United States Marshal to Serve Respondent. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:26 am
Instead, the Fee Justification Study shows that the affordable housing in-lieu fee of $20,946 per market rate unit was calculated based on an estimate of City’s need for 642 units of affordable housing. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Y. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
We begin with a short description of equity in its application in the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:55 am
In recent Eighth Circuit case, peer review DNA expert's testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause since the expert testified and was cross-examined about her own review and conclusions even though she did not conduct the testing, in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:18 pm
Petitioner filed his Petition for return of Children and Motion Warrant in Lieu of Habeas Corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada on August 30, 2013. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:55 am
The panel originally ruled in favor of United because it felt bound by a Seventh Circuit ruling in a similar case decided in 2000, EEOC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
United States v. [read post]
