Search for: "United States v. Linde Air Products Co." Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am by Miquel Montañá
In that case, Lord Hoffmann quoted Jackson J in Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co Inc v Linde Air products Co 339 US 605, 607 (1950) to illustrate that “the United States courts had «allow[ed] the patentee to extend his monopoly beyond his claims», so as to prevent «the unscrupulous copyist [from making] unimportant and insubstantial changes and substitutions in the patent which, though adding nothing,… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am by Miquel Montañá
In that case, Lord Hoffmann quoted Jackson J in Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co Inc v Linde Air products Co 339 US 605, 607 (1950) to illustrate that “the United States courts had «allow[ed] the patentee to extend his monopoly beyond his claims», so as to prevent «the unscrupulous copyist [from making] unimportant and insubstantial changes and substitutions in the patent which, though adding nothing,… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
  Before joining Linde, he managed domestic and international automotive product liability for DaimlerChrysler Corporation, litigated civil disputes at Feeney Kellett Wiener & Bush in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, and served as an Assistant United States Attorney in Detroit.] [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]