Search for: "United States v. Lindsay"
Results 101 - 120
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
A substantial number of unauthorized immigrants sought asylum in the United States, claiming as a defense to removal under the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:05 pm
" She is finishing her book manuscript Banking on the Body, a history of body banking in the United States, drawing upon her doctoral dissertation, Body Banks: A History of Milk Banks, Blood Banks and Sperm Banks in the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
” Michael Woods joined the head of the Government of Canada’s Trade Law Bureau, Robert Brookfield, Professor Lindsay Robertson of the University of Oklahoma and Professor James Hopkins of the University of Arizona on a panel to discuss the Indigenous elements in the Canada United States Mexico Agreement … _________________________ *Randomness here is created by Random.org and its list randomizing function. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
” State v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:21 am
An April 2016 decision by the federal appeals court in Chicago in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
Under the new law, those who may be tried by military commissions are described as "unprivileged enemy belligerents," theoretically a law-of-war term, but here meaning not only individuals who have actually "engaged in hostilities against the United States," but also individuals who have "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Under the new law, those who may be tried by military commissions are described as "unprivileged enemy belligerents," theoretically a law-of-war term, but here meaning not only individuals who have actually "engaged in hostilities against the United States," but also individuals who have "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
And when people take up arms against the United States and [are] captured within the United States, why should we not be able to use our military and intelligence community to question that person as to what they know about enemy activity? [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
The president of the United States has awesome power — quite literally, the power to blow us all to smithereens. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
Johnson note that in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
West Virginia Solicitor General Lindsay See argues for a group of red states. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Although the Supreme Court rejected the habeas-stripping provisions as unconstitutional in Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Based on this assumption the Court finds that a single family unit is not properly comparable to the unit make up of unrelated disabled residents of a group home. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
Wells noted details from a New York Times account of an initial hearing in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:10 am
Jones v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:57 am
Part II discusses the bipartisan federal policy over the last five decades in the United States to promote and protect the self-determination of Indian Tribes and the specific actions the United States has taken over that time period concerning Indian water rights. [read post]
