Search for: "United States v. Long"
Results 301 - 320
of 22,998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
United States (1996)), and two came after (United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
The case, LePage v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Co.Zall v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am
There have been precious few decisions from the United States Supreme Court where the opinion of Justice Sam Alito didn’t cause me paroxysms of pain. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
" Mikhail's post closes with this admonition: "the Justices should think long and hard before declaring that the President of the United States is not an Officer of the United States for the purposes of Section Three. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm
Wade reflected a national public policy applicable throughout the United States and its territories. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Here is a PDF copy of the United States District Court decision: Jette v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Domingo Amuchastegui has had a long and [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Lochner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]