Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 6:17 am
The counts all referenced the "honest services" fraud statute, 18 United States Code section 1346. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
(N v Secretary of State for the Home Department).Even if extreme destitution can be proved, there must be a close and direct link between the destitution and the actions of the state. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Seal v United Kingdom (Application no. 50330/07) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected the claim of a man detained by the police for 9 days under mental health law. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Kentucky was part of Virginia until 1792 when Virginia ceded the district of Kentucky to the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Lord Mance stated that “in matters of statutory construction, the statutory purpose and general scheme by which it is to be put into effect are of central importance. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
I think the comment of Lord Kerr of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Rugby Football Union, … is apposite. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
Lord Toulson’s judgment Lord Toulson reached the same ultimate conclusion as the other Lords but agreed with the approach taken by the Court of Appeal that, given the defence itself is based on public policy, it is right that other public policy considerations should be taken into account (Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47). [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
United States The US Department of Justice under the Trump administration secretly obtained the phone and email records of a CNN reporter who covers the Pentagon, the network reported. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
The Hague Convention has the force of law within the United Kingdom by virtue of CACA 1985, s 1(2). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
United States: According to UPI, a libel insurance issue has derailed the pending release of a documentary entitled “Unlawful Killing” about a supposed coverup of the death of Princess Diana. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
The departure from Abdulaziz The Secretary of State relied on Abdulaziz v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471 in which the Strasbourg Court held that there was no lack of respect for family life in denying entry to foreign spouses. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
