Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
Before Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson, judgment was handed down in the case of the Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water Plc, [2014] UKSC 40 on 2nd July 2014. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am
At some point thereafter, the United States moved him to Bagram in Afghanistan. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Lord Denning, reportedly the most celebrated English judge of the 20th century, colorfully put it best: “As a moth is drawn to the light, so is a litigant drawn to the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:22 am
This article explores fiction works like Breaking Bad and the book Room and shows how aspects of those works appear in actual cases, such as the United States Supreme Court prison-overcrowding case, Brown v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:31 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the legality of those measures in Sale v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
Howard: "Being completely non-technical it relates to the same invention, but the fact that it relates to the same invention does not lead to the conclusion that the patent of that invention in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and China is valid. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm
Rejecting Renvoi: Iran v Berend BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v... [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
Lord Hoffman commented:"22. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
As it happens my law school is housed in a building named for John Lord O'Brian, a one-time United States Attorney most famous for prosecuting Eugene V. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am
It is not so easy to separate out the content of the rights from the application of the margin of appreciation; for example the margin of appreciation may be central to determination whether a state owes a positive obligation under Article 8(1) – see Evans v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 36, para. [75] – or whether it has infringed the right to a fair trial under Article 6(1) – see Ashingdane v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 528,… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:49 am
There were no beds available in the local psychiatric unit, so Mr Reynolds was placed in a Council run intensive support unit. [read post]
