Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a… [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm
And as he narrates in volume one of Outside In, the starkest experiences of being an outsider came in his family’s transition to life in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
United States. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:42 am
Four cases in the House of Lords or Supreme Court’ at [17] ff. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Many fundamentals of law and procedure do remain constant for some time, but, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom has said, the Canadian Constitution and, by extension, the law itself, are expected to change and evolve. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
The focus of this post, however, is the legislation on the disposal of altars and fonts; in the instant case, the Chancellor stated: “Since the altar will have been dedicated to its sacramental role in the celebration of the Eucharist, or Lord’s Supper, it should not be profaned by any secular use which might result from its sale or disposal for any non-liturgical purpose. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Rosenthal, United States District Court judge for the Southern District of Texas, and Reagan W. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
For a detailed overview of Ruscoe v Cryptopia,please refer to our previous publication: Cryptocurrencies are property capable of being held on trust, New Zealand High Court holds The Hon Madam Justice Linda Chan noted that “the preponderance of jurisprudence recognises the proprietary nature of cryptocurrencies” and included case law on cryptocurrencies being considered as “property” (or similar definition) in various jurisdictions including England and Wales, the… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
The bishops are united in condemning homophobia and urged churches to welcome same-sex couples ‘unreservedly and joyfully’. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 pm
” Lord Mansfield spoke so. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Brown v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
