Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm
Authors: Tristan Dollie, Imogen Wilson The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25[1] has ruled on the point at which company directors must have regard to the interests of creditors (the so-called “creditors’ interest duty”) as set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006[2] (the “2006 Act”). [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 1:50 pm
ShareIn Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In 2017 the United States applied to extradite him. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:02 am
The stated intention is to hold this vote on 19 October 2023. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
By Richard Pike, Simon Yeung, Emelyne Peticca The limitations period for cartel damages cases in the United Kingdom has not finished evolving, as evidenced by two recent significant decisions. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am
This is done through the HRLA’s annual Judicial Review Mooting Competition, Careers Day, and for the first time this year, the Lord Kerr Essay Competition, which was set up by the HRLA to honour the legacy and human rights contribution of Lord Brian Francis Kerr, Baron Kerr of Tonaghmore, the former Supreme Court Justice, following a generous donation by his son, Patrick Kerr. 2022 Winning Essay by Cidalia Lewis-Lettington The interplay between climate change… [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
The three questions on how to address equivalents were set out by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Lilly [2017] UKSC 48: Does the variant achieve substantially the same result in substantially the same way as the invention (i.e. the inventive concept revealed by the patent)? [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 2:11 pm
From Bailey v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Jack Rakove, Randy Barnett and others on how the Supreme Court is shaping the United States (BBC). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am
Lord Hamblen and Lady Rose dissent. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
Last week saw promulgation of Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52, a summary of which you can find here. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
Asylum seekers, Rwanda and the ECtHR On 14 June, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) granted an urgent interim measure in the case of KN v United Kingdom (no. 28774/22). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
Lord Templeman referred to the principle in Salomon v Salomon & co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1, as the ‘unyielding rock’ on which company law is constructed. [read post]
