Search for: "United States v. Madsen"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:16 pm
On February 26, 2008 the Supreme Court heard oral argument on a case involving the issue of presentment under the False Claims Act: Allison Engine Co. v. the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Madsen. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
United States, involving two provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
However, when the trial court’s ruling involves libelous speech, the United States Supreme Court has indicated that independent appellate review is proper. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:45 pm
My very first Lawfare post, back in December 2011, focused on the messy constitutional question raised by United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 3:00 am
" Id. at 22 (quoting Madsen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
United States, which raises the question whether military commissions may constitutionally try offenses that are not recognized as international war crimes. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/08/08-10167.pdf United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
Paragraphs 7-10 of the Complaint say Madsen, Dougherty, Hillman and Grives (i) are “United States citizen[s] and resident[s] of the State of California” and (ii) were, at “all times relevant” to the claims in the Complaint, “supervisory employee[s] of . . . [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
committed by an enemy belligerent against the United States in the context of an armed conflict. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/15/08-30360.pdf United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
United States, striking down the former Virginia governor’s federal corruption convictions; she argues that the ruling “broadcasts entirely the wrong message to both elected officials and the businessmen, businesswomen and their lobbyists trying to woo them into action. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
And it went on to explain that [t]o that end, the United States Supreme Court has considered the type of speech at issue when determining the appropriate standards to apply in defamation cases. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
State v. [read post]
