Search for: "United States v. Maher"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Maher, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:12 pm
Making a formal pact with federal prosecutors has many advantages, as demonstrated in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:45 am
" Bloate v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:38 am
See Arar v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:49 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bivens v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
And this morning at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has a post titled "An Analysis of United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 7:47 am
He emphasized, however, that the non-refoulement provision applies only to persons actually in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
He accused the majority of “mischaracterizing this as an immigration case, when it is in fact about forbidden tactics allegedly employed by United States law enforcement officers in a terrorism inquiry. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 3:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Maher Arar v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:59 pm
Stris, ERISA, Agency Costs, and the Future of Health Care in the United States, 76 Fordham L. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:39 pm
The court stated in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:15 am
City of Oklahoma, 816 F.2d 539, 540-41 (10th Cir. 1987), alleging a right of privacy under the Florida state constitution and the United States Constitution; Brashear v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:50 am
In assessing the constitutionality of the agreement, the Canadian Court found that the United States does not comply adequately with Article 33 of the UN Refugee Convention, which prohibits return to persecution, or Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture, which prohibits return to torture -- specifically naming the Maher Arar case as an example of the United States' failure to protect. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 11:22 pm
In assessing the constitutionality of the agreement, the Canadian Court found that the United States does not comply adequately with Article 33 of the UN Refugee Convention, which prohibits return to persecution, or Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture, which prohibits return to torture -- specifically naming the Maher Arar case as an example of the United States' failure to protect. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Secret Advantages of Judge Taylor's Opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:57 pm
See State v. [read post]
