Search for: "United States v. Marrero"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
First, Judge Marrero rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that because the Euronext purchases of Alstom shares had been "initiated" in the United States, they represented "domestic transactions" as required by Morrison. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 573, 585-86 (1980). [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 573, 585-86 (1980). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:46 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:29 am
National Australia Bank will have on securities litigation in the United States involving non-U.S. companies. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
§ 17C-15-18(a)(1); State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
We recently discussed a troubling decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
On February 22, 2023, Judge Victor Marrero of the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
Arturo Marrero, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 10-60244-CR-COOKE. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office - Trademark Basics [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
Oct. 1, 2010); United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:38 am
The Zaleppa Court further emphasized that the jury did not enter any award for past medical expenses.The Superior Court held that there was no legal basis under either federal or Pennsylvania law to assert the interests of the United States government as to the reimbursement of Medicare liens. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 8:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Judge Marrero confirmed the award. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Louisiana October 7, 2019 – Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Ramos v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
