Search for: "United States v. Marti"
Results 81 - 100
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am
United States, in which the Court held that a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s mistress could not be prosecuted in federal court under laws prohibiting the use and possession of chemical weapons. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Hobby Lobby, Inc., the United States adopts a similar cost-shifting argument as part of its compelling interest analysis under RFRA. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:19 am
In Felder v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
In Biden v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:00 pm
US, the crack v. powder sentencing case, here, and more on today's grant in No. 06-1221, Sprint/United v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
At issue in No. 06-1005, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the… [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
United States, Timbs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
