Search for: "United States v. Marti" Results 81 - 100 of 370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2019, 7:04 am by Edith Roberts
She catalogs the justice’s occasional victories, like United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices declined to decide whether Apprendi applies to criminal restitution – here, an order requiring two men to pay over $300,000 in restitution to CitiGroup. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am by David Kris
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:44 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 18-3052, a case challenging the constitutionality of Robert Mueller’s appointment to serve as ‘Special Counsel’ for the Russia investigation. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Lee, General Counsel, Export-Import Bank of the United States Elizabeth R. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman argues that even though “most early reports of the Supreme Court’s decision last Tuesday in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
United States has lots of new directions in it. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Victoria Clark
Dana Stuster updated us on the Hodeidah offensive in Yemen, the United States’ decision to withdraw from the U.N. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for CNN, Marty Tankleff weighs in on Dassey v. [read post]
RBG
29 May 2018, 1:21 pm by Harold O'Grady
Through Ginsburg’s history you can track the women’s movement in the United States:  her fight for legal equality (for women and men), her position on an increasingly conservative court. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Whereas the the Senate bill requests information on the special counsel investigation as a whole, the House bill has a more specific ask: Each report … shall include but not be limited to … any evidence of criminal activity that implicates the President, any person within the Executive Office of the President at the time of the report or any time prior, or any person appointed as an officer of the United States by the President (regardless of whether or not that… [read post]