Search for: "United States v. Mayer" Results 141 - 160 of 353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Aug. 13, 2010) The present posture of the case is that Ultramercial is again appealing from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Jim Singer
” Fast forward to 2014, after the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:58 am by Beth Graham
In his paper, Professor Rau discusses the effect the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in BG Group v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:56 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 6-30-14 Petition for Rehearing En Banc An excerpt: The panel decision conflicts with the May 19, 2014 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Petrella v.Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 132; 188 L.Ed.2d 979 (2014) (Petrella). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:15 am by Stacy K. Marcus
  In 1963, the screenplay became a copyrighted work registered with the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:03 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: Roy Rabindranath, Contributor TitleRealtime Data, LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:07 am by Craig Whitney
The doctrine of laches cannot be invoked as a bar to a plaintiff’s claim for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations period, according to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Petrella v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am by Dennis Crouch
The USITC argues that these questions are fully answered (in its favor) by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. [read post]