Search for: "United States v. McDonnell Douglas Corp" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said Plaintiff’s claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title VII are evaluated "under the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, citing Vega v Hempstead Union Free Sch. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said Plaintiff’s claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title VII are evaluated "under the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, citing Vega v Hempstead Union Free Sch. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:49 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
The Court was guided by the analytical framework articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm by Sean Wajert
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 890 F.2d 698, 703 (4th Cir. 1989). [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:08 am
Therefore, to survive a Motion for Summary Judgment, Ruggles was required to establish a circumstantial case under a burden shifting framework that the United States Supreme Court set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]