Search for: "United States v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 9:58 am
However, the plaintiffs argued that the United States Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:59 pm
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (the District), which together own and operate the facilities that make up the CAWS. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
The filings, in defense of Illinois, come from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago and the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Tarick Loufti v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
Times highlights the responses-also filed at the Court yesterday-by three other defendants in the suit (the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, and the Army Corps of Engineers). [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
Nor does it handle claims for injuries involving: Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Chicago Park District, Chicago Board of Education, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Chicago Public Building Commission, Cook County and State of Illinois (IDOT). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Click Here Cory King settles with state on feedlot charges. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
