Search for: "United States v. Michael Alexander" Results 1 - 20 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
On December 8, 2015, the Second Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:29 am by Amanda Frost
Next Monday the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Alexander Gray and Michael Levy for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
On the one hand, the argument for the fragility of Sullivan after Bruen is examined in Alexander Hiland & Michael L Smith “Using Bruen to Overturn New York Times v Sullivan” 50 Pepperdine Law Review (forthcoming) (SSRN). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:05 am
The lion skins and skulls (the “Lion Trophy” or “Lion Trophies,” or “Cargo”) were shipped to the United States for tanning and taxidermy, but at some point were lost in transit. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am by Nicholas Mosvick
United States reviewed and upheld an act of Congress as constitutional—with Alexander Hamilton arguing for the validity of the tax in question. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:31 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Nealy, No. 11-0615/AR followed by United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Strang, A Light Unseen: The History of Catholic Legal Education in the United States: A Response to Our Colleagues and Critics, 59 Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 1-50 (2020).David. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Kali Borkoski
Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:42 am by Rachel Sachs
At Wired, David Kravets examines the Fourth Circuit’s recent decision holding that impersonating a police officer is not speech protected under the First Amendment in light of the Court’s recent holding in United States v. [read post]