Search for: "United States v. Michael Cox" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 Paragraph 75 of the amended complaint, for example, alleges thatCongress has provided that it is illegal for undocumented immigrants to be in the United States and has required the executive branch to remove those individuals. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter the IRS) disallowed the deduction, resulting in years of litigation before the United States Tax Court, which ultimately ruled in favor of the IRS. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Evans & Anna Hood, Religious Autonomy and Labour Law: A Comparison of Jurisprudence of the United States and the European Court of Human Rights, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2012).Michael J. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States CNN reports that a settlement has been reached in a defamation case against Bill Cosby — but representatives for the comedian say he didn’t cut the deal. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm by Kelsey Farish
Disney has responded to the copyright lawsuit lodged earlier this year in California by the Estate of Michael Jackson (MJJ Productions (et al) v Walt Disney Company and ABC INC). [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and… [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
  It so happens that last week, United States District Court Judge Michael M. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
Looking inward, Citibank, AIG, and Bank of America could be thought of as instrumentalities of the United States. [read post]