Search for: "United States v. Michael Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 5:34 am
" United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:51 am
Valdes v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Duckson, Michael W. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:02 am
Kerry Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawJosé E. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
Michael V. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Schmid, The Real Shariah Risk: Why the United States Cannot Afford to Miss the Islamic Finance Moment, (University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 3, 2013).Davi S. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:23 pm
One of the cases establishing this principle is Printz v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
Davis SC18864 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
