Search for: "United States v. Michael Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:31 am by David Markus
United States that a similar provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 Paragraph 75 of the amended complaint, for example, alleges thatCongress has provided that it is illegal for undocumented immigrants to be in the United States and has required the executive branch to remove those individuals. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) .................. 4 Johnson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
Congress’s enumerated powers don’t extend to making this local bar fight a federal hate crime [Ilya Shapiro on Cato brief in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Conservatives, Time notes, once looked to universities to “reproduce the middle and upper echelons of Christian society in the United States—something classical liberals from Thomas Jefferson to today’s postliberal academics on the right … have historically appreciated and felt worth conserving. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
  The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
New Nippon Steel Corporation Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawJean Galbraith, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawDavid P. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
On the one hand, the argument for the fragility of Sullivan after Bruen is examined in Alexander Hiland & Michael L Smith “Using Bruen to Overturn New York Times v Sullivan” 50 Pepperdine Law Review (forthcoming) (SSRN). [read post]