Search for: "United States v. Michael Jones"
Results 1 - 20
of 489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
In the last blog entry, the Fourth Amendment Right to Privacy implications of the United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
In some instances, like in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm
(Orin Kerr) No, concludes Judge Bennett in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:50 pm
Over at the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that the results in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a Jones Act seaman’s claims for negligence and unseaworthiness, confirming that the seaman’s burden is not weightless. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:31 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:25 am
by Michael J. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a Jones Act seaman’s claims for negligence and unseaworthiness, confirming that the seaman’s burden is not weightless. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
