Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2014, 1:43 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
<> Treasure State Resource v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:44 am
Jeremy Fisher United States Supreme Court No. 09-91 Decided: December 7, 2009 The United States Supreme Court issued a per curium decision on December 7 regarding a Fourth Amendment case. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:06 am
In the case of Orum v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
United States Brief 3. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANASOUTH BEND DIVISIONROBERT BROWN, Plaintiff vs. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
See also United States v Power, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 20-po-331-GLS), 2023 WL 131050, and United States v Robertson, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 22-po-867-GLS), 2023 WL 131051, *12 ("[T]he Court… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:00 am
United States, No. 22-1789, 2023 WL 4141227 (6th Cir. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:02 pm
Today, the United States is the only country in the world that that allows child offenders to be locked away for life. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 1:25 pm
, United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear two Michigan habeas corpus cases. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
This left people with the option to set up residency in other states in order to qualify to file for divorce jurisdictionally, which takes 60-90 days and an intent to reside there indefinitely.Fortunately for these couples, the recent United States Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:55 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in favor of a narrow statutory holding stating that video-on-demand is... [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:07 am
"Pursuant to the dictates of the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 (2015), we remand this matter for proceedings consistent with this opinion. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
