Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm
She reasoned that banning males from a state nursing school was based on tired stereotypes, which set the stage for the later decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
We explained in a recent amicus brief from Michigan that "Since 2011, [Tillman] has expressly eschewed opining on the scope of Section 3's 'Office . . . under the United States'-language. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Nortonjnorton@nfllp.com1250 Broadway, 27th Fl.New York, NY 10001(212) 619-5400# # #COMPLAINT: Adrian Dominican Sisters, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
With that as an introduction, here is a brief description of the main challenges property owners can assert against condemning entities: Public Use: The Constitutions of Michigan and the United States allow government-authorized entities to condemn property for “public use. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan asserted, “where a person has taken a solemn oath to support the Constitution of the United States there is a fair moral implication that he cannot afterward commit an act which in its effect would destroy the Constitution of the United States without incurring the guilt of at least moral perjury. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” In her 102-page ruling, Wallace declared that “[a]fter considering the arguments on both sides, the Court is persuaded that ‘officers of the United States’ did not include the President of the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:15 pm
L. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
In a forthcoming article for the Michigan Law Review, Carter Brace of the University of Michigan Law School explains that the Supreme Court in Milliken v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
The SIFI classification—which is currently limited to the largest banks in the United States—enables increased scrutiny by the U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
" The complaint (full text) in Right to Life of Michigan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in Apple v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
Johnson Fellow:“A Legal Form of Marriage”: The Legality of Queer Families in the United States, 1830-1920 Anin Luo, Princeton University Empathizing beyond Humanity: The 1970s Emergence of Personhood for Animals and the Environment Robyn Morse, University of Virginia, John Wertheimer/Davidson College Fellow: Enterprising Value: Labor Transitions and Legal Maneuvers During the Rise of the Oil Economy in Bahrain Wallace Teska, Stanford University, William… [read post]
