Search for: "United States v. Millan"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm
Martin Zilber v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:21 am
Though the new law doesn't apply to the case, the opinion is in line with the new law.The court said that the unambiguous language of NAFTA provides that only the United States may challenge a state law as conflicting with the terms of the agreement between it, Mexico and Canada. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Parliament had given the Ministers permission to deal with a future situation where patients became entrapped in medium-secure units as they had been in the State Hospital, and a discretion to go further, to deal with other kinds of unit, if it ever became desirable. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; Tot v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Monday Tripping Up the Utility Company: Millan v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:45 am
App. at 502-03 (citing United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:01 am
A search is unconstitutional not in the abstract but only to the extent it impermissibly infringes on the particular defendant's reasonable expectation of privacy (United States v Payner, 447 US 727, 731 [1980] ["the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights are violated only when the challenged conduct invaded his legitimate expectation of privacy rather than that of a third party"] [emphasis in original]). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Millan, 912 F.2d at 1015; United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:47 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
