Search for: "United States v. Miranda" Results 461 - 480 of 1,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2012, 12:07 pm
  A panel of the Ninth Circuit in Miranda B. adopted a particular standard on this issue by quoting from a purported en banc opinion written by Chief Judge Kozinski, with a citation to "United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:11 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Cortez's SADO attorney argued that the questioning was clearly intended for use in his subsequent prosecution.The Court of Appeals held that Cortez was not entitled to Miranda warnings on the basis that he was not in "custodial interrogation" when he was, er, "interviewed" by the prison official; that the prison official was not the equivalent of the state police, nor was he acting on behalf of the state police, who later took over the case;… [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm by Phil Dixon
Miranda protections do not apply to supervised release proceedings U.S. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the conviction and 180 month sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in United States v, Kelley Kelley was convicted after a bench trial in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:07 am
The opinion is the latest in a string of Doyle violations found by the Third Circuit (United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
As detailed in this order list, the Supreme Court this morning granted cert on United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
Lee-Riveras ("On appeal the defendant claims that (1) his due process right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment to the United State constitution, was violated when the state elicited testimony describing his silence after he had received a Miranda warning in violation of Doyle v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"Local" and "particular" values, i.e., American values, cannot be given too large a role.But what about trial by jury, the self-incrimination privilege, the Miranda rule, and, most of all, the exclusionary rule of Mapp v. [read post]