Search for: "United States v. Mohamed"
Results 141 - 160
of 525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2014, 12:42 pm
L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001), held that the “United State’s authority to detain an enemy combatant is not dependent on whether an individual would be a threat to the United States or its allies if released but rather upon the continuation of hostilities. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
The 1953 case in which the Supreme Court established it, United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals precedent, which includes Akran Mohammed Ali, et al. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 4:51 am
In its scramble, the agency made the momentous decision to use harsh methods the United States had long condemned. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:32 am
He eventually came to the United States and currently lives in Alexandria, Virginia. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:00 am
In Mohamed v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:01 am
Anne Marie Brennan, Historical Reflections on the Criminalisation of Terrorism under International Law from the League of Nations to R v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:33 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88-89 (1935). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm
In Afghanistan Mohamed was tortured and inhumanely treated by United States officials. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am
After several weeks, United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:10 am
United States, 193 U.S. 197, 400–401 (1904)(Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:40 pm
Reported on Friday by the Miami Herald’s Carol Rosenberg: defense attorneys in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 14 (2010) (“[The petitioner] argues that the Federal Rules of Evidence and the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
