Search for: "United States v. Montenegro"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2021, 6:48 am
June 29, 2020) Petitioner sought €1,132.39 for “his airline travel to the United States and his airline travel back to Montenegro with” N.L. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am
N.L. remained living with respondent in Podgorica and attended school in Montenegro until she entered the United States in July 2019. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:14 am
” United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:57 pm
I think everyone has, but never have I seen it laid out as clearly as is done in the opinion below: Montenegro v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:00 pm
Lucaj claims his arrest was illegal and the United States was improperly involved. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
SEC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 6:11 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
SEC, DOJ Announce $95 Million Settlement In Bribery Actions Against Deutsche Telekom, Hungarian Unit
5 Jan 2012, 9:15 am
By Joe Lustig Magyar Telekom, Hungary’s largest telecommunications provider, and majority owner Deutsche Telekom agreed to pay over $95 million to settle charges that they bribed government and political party officials in Macedonia and Montenegro, the Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission announced Dec. 29 (United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 5:38 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
What Does NATO Membership Obligate the United States to Do? [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 5:58 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:59 am
After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:28 pm
United States) is notable for revealing his concern over unequal access to documents between State Parties and the limitations on the Court's ability to establish and assess facts. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
The BBC discloses that the Islamic State alleges that the United States has launched airstrikes targeting the Tabqa dam near Raqqa, the so-called caliphate’s largest stronghold in Syria. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm
In a separate set of proceedings instituted by Yugoslavia against all the member States of NATO relating to the Kosovo air campaign, the Court firmly stated in December 2004 that Yugoslavia had not been a member of the United Nations, that it had therefore not enjoyed a right of access to the Court, and that the Court was therefore not competent to deal with the case (Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 6:39 am
Yesterday in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:16 am
Read the full story here USPTO announces public hearing on trademark fee schedule The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced in a notice published in the Federal Register on 27 April 2023 that the Trademark Public Advisory Committee (TPAC) will hold a hybrid public meeting on 5 June 2023 from 1 to 3 p.m. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
