Search for: "United States v. Mound"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Which in our humble opinion has a good shot of a grant, since the Ninth Circuit's opinion directly conflicts with both Ehrlich and the Texas Supreme Court's opinion in City of Flower Mound v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
For example, in Town Of Flower Mound v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
(I will note that even the hallowed grounds of pitching mounds in major league baseball parks are now stamped with corporate logos.) [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
Sometimes oral arguments do seem pointless–they’re a very short hour in which not too much gets thoroughly explored, while the justices already have read mounds and mounds of briefs covering every single angle on the case one could possibly imagine. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
It would try and block its use at the state and local police levels by tying the ability to get federal monies in grant funding to the state agreement to ban use of biometric technology in its jurisdiction. [read post]
