Search for: "United States v. Mustafa" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:00 pm by Wells Bennett
On the eve of another series of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Citing a DC Circuit case United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011): The European Court of Human Rights has rejected Abu Hamza’s claim that his trial in the United Kingdom for soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges was unfair. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:44 am by Adam Wagner
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected radical preacher Abu Hamza’s claim that his 2005-6 trial, at which he was convicted of soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges, was unfair. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
Conceding that no cases were directly on point, Connell cites United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:09 am by 1 Crown Office Row
(Tickell is also correct that this represents a much lower “rate of defeat” for the UK than some other Contracting States.) [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am by Rachel Bercovitz
James Pohl’s April 25 ruling denying defendant Mustafa al-Hawsawi’s defense motion to dismiss in United States v. al-Hawsawi; the legal weight of reports that “major combat operations” have concluded in Iraq; and the contours of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis’s report on the future of detainee policy, among others. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm by Zack Bluestone
The main case she cited was United States v. [read post]