Search for: "United States v. Napolitano" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:19 am by Matthew Kolken
 The United States derives its core strength because we embrace these values and abide by the rule of law. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien,… [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm by CAPTAIN
  "In rejecting Smallwood’s Fourth Amendment challenge, the district court relied upon United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
”  Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm by David S. Jones
Citizenship and Immigration Service has provided additional guidance on the implementation of the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am by Adam Schlossman
Times by Jeffrey Kayes discusses the possibility that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano may weigh in on the Arizona statute at issue in United States Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Shultz Former Secretary of State   General Michael V. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:00 pm
In a departure from the voluntary E-Verify, employers that are a party to a contract (or subcontract) containing this E-Verify clause will be required to use E-Verify to confirm the employment eligibility of all new hires and all employees who perform work directly under the contract.Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
 At the Conglomerate, Tamara Piety discusses the likely impact of Citizens United on a series of civil RICO cases filed by the United States against tobacco companies; petitions for certiorari in the case are currently before the Court. [read post]