Search for: "United States v. Napolitano" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Shultz Former Secretary of State   General Michael V. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien,… [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In Newsweek, Ian McDougall looks ahead at the issues in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:35 am by Harold O'Grady
Professor Napolitano discusses his role in the upcoming Evening with United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia scheduled for Friday, March 21, 2014 from 5:30 pm to 7:00 pm at the Brooklyn Academy of Music’s Howard Gilman Opera House. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:16 am by Larry
Remember my post on U.S. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled today in Burns-Ramirez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm by David S. Jones
Citizenship and Immigration Service has provided additional guidance on the implementation of the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]