Search for: "United States v. Nasir" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Cody M. Poplin
” The United States has also pledged $139 million in humanitarian aid for Yemen. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Tara Hofbauer
The National Journal asked foreign policy experts what the United States should do to combat the Islamic State. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:20 am by Quinta Jurecic
Despite the best efforts of the Obama administration, the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay remains open—as Wells reminded us with the news of pre-trial motions in United States v. [read post]
” He also called the threat of a terrorist group launching a cyberattack on the United States a “small but potentially growing problem. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:08 pm
Food-related illness and death in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Nasir Mehmood v Up and Coming TV Ltd [2023] EWHC 1426 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Music and Copyright IPKat provides a summary of the three cases brought in the United States claiming that the song Thinking Out Loud performed by Ed Sheeran, copied Let’s Get It On performed by Marvin Gaye. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Under [federal immigration regulations], Nabil (and Sawsan, derivatively) would be deportable … if Nabil and Sawsan were actually married when Nabil entered the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 12 September 2023, The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the United Kingdom (nos. 64371/16 and 64407/16). [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO Rulings and Resolution Statements 04515-21 Brassington v stokesentinel.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2019), No breach – after investigation 03296-21 Carr v Southend Echo, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019) Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 01348-21 IPSO v Tatler, 16 Payment to criminals (2019), No breach – after investigation Statements in Open Court and Apologies NVTV has apologised to Nasir Butt for allegations that he… [read post]