Search for: "United States v. Nat. Bank of Commerce" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[xiii] And on Sept. 21, the United Kingdom’s Law Commission announced the start of “two new projects to ensure that English law can accommodate two emerging technologies that could [revolutionize] commerce: smart contracts and digital assets. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm by Matthias Weller
Roy GOODE Creativity and Transnational Commercial Law: from Karkhemish to Cape Town Bernd GRZESZICK Diversity in and by Law – the Example of Federal and State Constitutions Christian HATTENHAUER „Das ist Grönländisches Recht, und ein sehr Natürliches! [read post]
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden advances these allegations on behalf of an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who have declared bankruptcy since 2005 across the United States, with loans originated or serviced by the Defendants. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Casino Magic Corp., 384 F.3d 510 (8th Cir. 2004) — 384_f.3d_510 Plains Commerce Bank v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]