Search for: "United States v. National Exchange Bank" Results 101 - 120 of 744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 4:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
The court said that the allegation that a shareholder placed a buy order in the United States that was then executed outside the U.S. does not “standing alone” establish that the shareholder “incurred irrevocable liability in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm by James Hamilton
National Australia Bank, Ltd. should remain in force or, instead, be overridden to allow such private securities fraud actions. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
"   Judge Ware said that the plaintiffs’ "listed on" argument was "misplaced," noting that in the Morrison case itself, National Australia Bank had ADRs listed on the NYSE, but the plaintiffs in Morrison were unable to state a Section 10(b) claim because "that Section of the Exchange Act focuses only on securities transactions that take place in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, it upheld the conviction of a fleeing bank robber who broke into an elderly woman’s home and instructed her to go with him to her computer room – four to nine feet away – so that police would not see him. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
National Australia Bank precludes so-called "f-cubed" claims (claims brought by foreign plaintiffs who bought foreign stock on a foreign exchange). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by Kurt J. Schafers
In July 2007 the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) was created through the consolidation of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and the member regulation, enforcement and arbitration functions of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
To an observer from the United States, one of the most striking things about Israel, and the Middle East in general, is how small it is. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm by Ted Allen
National Australia Bank (2010) ruling that significantly limited the ability of investors to sue foreign companies in American courts. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:06 am by Louis M. Solomon
National Australia Bank (No. 08-1191), the Court held that Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 did not provide a private cause of action in “foreign-cubed” cases—cases where foreign plaintiffs sue foreign defendants for misconduct in connection with securities traded on foreign exchanges (hence “foreign cubed”). [read post]