Search for: "United States v. National Exchange Bank"
Results 141 - 160
of 746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
United States, 136 S. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
In the late winter and early spring of 2020, the once rosy outlook for oil and gas fracking companies turned decidedly darker as the Covid-19 pandemic gripped the nation. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission require companies to report climate risks and the United States to set a national price on carbon emissions to reduce emissions consistent with the Paris Agreement. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of a lessee’s ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS… [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 3:29 pm
National Australia Bank, in which the Court clarified that the U.S. securities laws applies only to securities transactions that take place in the United States, either on an exchange or otherwise. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
(The part of the industrial sector covered by EU ETS is entirely exempt from the national carbon tax.) [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:17 pm
Insufficient Connection to the May 2019 National Emergency Proclamation The companies argue that the sanctions order is not properly supported by a public proclamation of a national emergency, as IEEPA requires, notwithstanding Trump’s May 2019 invocation of a national emergency vis-à-vis adversarial foreign influence in the supply chain of communication and information technologies used in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am
The United States currently has more than 35 national emergencies in force—all triggering the broad IEEPA sanctions authorities. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
OEIGWG CHAIRMANSHIP SECOND REVISED DRAFT 06.08.2020 LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT TO REGULATE, IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, THE ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Preamble The State Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument),Reaffirming the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations; Recalling the nine core International Human Rights Instruments adopted by the United… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
Some employee free speech protections were enacted following the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned employment discrimination based on race, religion, sex, and national origin, and are modeled on that statute. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
National Security, Surveillance and Human Rights, R. [read post]
