Search for: "United States v. Navarro"
Results 41 - 60
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
United States, the Court split 5-4 over whether employee stock options are taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm
Second, the court based the decision, at least in part, on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Encino Motor Cars, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
Rejection of C Plea Agreement held to be an abuse of discretion;Case remanded for resentencing by different judge In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, maintaining that the case “presents an excellent opportunity for the Court to protect the separation of powers in an area where it has otherwise been skittish. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am
United States. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Navarro, April 2, 2018, Thomas, C.). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 8:49 am
In a decision issued on April 2, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States held in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
United States, 480 U.S. 522–526 (1987) (per curiam)); see also Henson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:50 pm
By Ed Hardin On April 2, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:03 pm
The United State Supreme Court in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:43 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that service advisors at car dealerships are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime pay requirement under an exemption for any “salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles …” (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
Those three, along with Justices Anthony Kennedy and Neil Gorsuch, joined Thomas’ opinion rejecting the contrary ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:22 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision affirms the established pay practices for service advisors at dealerships throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:36 am
United States Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
