Search for: "United States v. Nice"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2018, 10:46 am
United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
What United States Supreme Court decisions actually get the most action in legal circles? [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:59 am
On Monday, March 21, 2016, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the matter of Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 8:58 am
" United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 8:10 am
Here’s a nice follow up ruling in the case of Curran v Camden National, a particularly interesting ERISA case that I discussed here. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 2:54 pm
"It's one thing to legally come to the United States as an au pair, fall in love while you're here, marry a citizen, have your spouse die, and then ask to please be allowed to stay. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Citing Barrett v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
How can it be that individual decisions of a low-level consular officer are not reviewable, but an executive order issued by the President of the United States is? [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:31 am
LGI Corporation, et al., the court held that states, including public universities, are not entitled to sovereign immunity from Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings filed at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to challenge an issued patent. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:43 am
” Babbitt v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
We're all used to the United States Supreme Court and its fractured political composition, which in turn generates lots of dissents -- and often somewhat vitriolic ones, at that. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 3:32 pm
Szonyi is formally a citizen of Hungary (who came to the United States in 1957, when he was four years old), even though he's been in the United States for over 60 years, that means he's subject to deportation. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:48 am
Today, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
Citing Google v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
