Search for: "United States v. Norton" Results 61 - 80 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2017, 3:30 am by Helen Norton
Helen Norton Suppose the United States elected a president with authoritarian tendencies. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena v. von Saher 14-545Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit, in holding that this action should proceed, properly second-guessed and rejected the executive branch's U.S. foreign policy determinations. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am by Walter Olson
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
On July 25, 2017, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an investigative report stating that US securities laws apply to sales of securities in the United States purchased with virtual currencies or distributed with blockchain technology. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:32 pm by Glenn
Make Patent Trolls Pay in Court (op-ed) | http://t.co/TZa5FEscwL http://t.co/7aR1yogbxb 15:55:59, 2013-06-05 United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]