Search for: "United States v. Norton" Results 61 - 80 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 10:20 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
The lawsuit is being brought by the Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation at the Goldwater Institute on behalf of two state business corporations against Michael Sullivan, the director of the Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF), which enforces the law. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:11 am by Steve Davies
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR AND UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:10-mc-00377) Douglas S. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:30 am by Helen Norton
Helen Norton Suppose the United States elected a president with authoritarian tendencies. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena v. von Saher 14-545Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit, in holding that this action should proceed, properly second-guessed and rejected the executive branch's U.S. foreign policy determinations. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am by Walter Olson
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
On July 25, 2017, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an investigative report stating that US securities laws apply to sales of securities in the United States purchased with virtual currencies or distributed with blockchain technology. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:32 pm by Glenn
Make Patent Trolls Pay in Court (op-ed) | 15:55:59, 2013-06-05 United States v. [read post]