Search for: "United States v. Ocean" Results 81 - 100 of 786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 6:55 am by WIMS
      The majority also notes that, "Because neither the United States nor Japan recognizes Australia's jurisdiction over any portion of the Southern Ocean, Cetacean owes no respect to the Australian order." [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:55 am
The lawsuit in Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:21 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Prior to delivering the rig to the United States, Maersk had learned about this injunction and made the relevant modification. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:59 am by Aaron Lang
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), which interpreted covered “waters” in the CWA to include “only those relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water forming geographical features that are described in ordinary parlance as streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 2:15 am
  The Attorney General said that, under the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:59 am by Aaron Lang
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), which interpreted covered “waters” in the CWA to include “only those relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water forming geographical features that are described in ordinary parlance as streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 12:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
Anderson While an ocean away, supermarket Morrisons’ loss in the United Kingdom’s appellate court should act as a warning to all United States-based and international companies. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
United States, 547 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2208 (2006). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:52 am
Bonafé, Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean Jed Odermatt, Council of the European Union v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm by Kerry Shapiro
Specifically, the court agreed with Petitioner’s contentions that SWRCB lacked authority under Porter-Cologne to adopt a statewide WQCP under its policy-making authority and was instead limited to establishing statewide WQCPs for only for those areas specifically identified by Porter-Cologne—i.e., “Waters of the United States” and for “ocean waters,” including non-federal ocean waters. [read post]