Search for: "United States v. Ochs"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In case you're wondering why this topic has been chosen, it has been quite controversial in the United States and, in a recent judgment in Och-Ziff, Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was actually part of both EU and United Kingdom trade mark law. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:40 pm
While this might not usually be a matter of surprise in the State Department report, the fact that the European Court of Human Rights handed down its important decision in A, B & C v Ireland in December makes it a strange omission. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
… I expressly refrained from expressing any view on it in Och-Ziff, since it did not arise in that case. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Furåsen and Åss (EPLAW) United Kingdom The Hargreaves Review – perhaps we don’t have to make heavy weather of this (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) Elvis appears in Court, which is more than can be said for the defendant: EWHC grants summary judgment in favour of EPE – Elvis Presley Enterprises v Carollo (trading as Everness) (IPKat) Initial interest confusion recognized by the English courts: Och-Ziff… [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
‘Initial interest confusion’ part of EU trade mark law, says judge – EWCH decision in Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd & Anor v Och Capital LLP & Anor (IPKat) Rooney: will his image rights income wax or wayne? [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:57 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:56 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
