Search for: "United States v. Oklahoma" Results 41 - 60 of 1,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2023, 2:07 pm by NARF
United States (Breach of Trust; Treaty of Fort Laramie of 1868) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2023.html Romanelli v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
Oklahoma, 22-6500Issues: (1) Whether a court may require a defendant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable fact finder would have returned a [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Biden, 22-1225Issues: (1) Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 12:45 pm by Marcia Coyle
The Biden administration appealed the ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]