Search for: "United States v. One Package" Results 141 - 160 of 1,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This consumer class action litigation (Suchanek et al v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:33 pm
By a vote of six to three, the Court today in No. 05-1345, United Haulers Association v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
Meanwhile, one provision in the package that has drawn little attention so far could have significant implications for the United States Tax Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 1:09 pm by Steven Eversole
As our Birmingham drug crimes defense attorneys can explain, it is much more difficult to smuggle illegal drugs through the United States mail than one might think. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Shannon O'Hare
  The passporting system will be replaced by one known as the EU system of equivalence. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unilever United States, Inc., --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2023 WL 6429805, No. 20-cv-1672-AGS-BLM (S.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming Shareholders are ratcheting up pressure on corporate executives to reveal the extent of political expenditures, and, in at least one case, pushing back against over-the-top compensation packages for executives. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
Mastroianni, United States District Judge, for the District of Massachusetts, upheld the right of an investor, in a class action lawsuit against Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, to proceed with his underlying claims sounding in fraudulent misrepresentation. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:07 am by SHG
United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952). [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]