Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Property"
Results 1 - 20
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
The list of states that have enacted such legislation in 2023 includes Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Virginia—an additional 20 states have introduced bills that would regulate foreign ownership of real estate if enacted.[2] In this post, we discuss: The typical contours of state legislation relating to certain foreign… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
The Plan included three elementary schools (one already in existence), one middle school, and one high school (previously planned and already under construction). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
THIS ARTICLE DISCUSSES THE IMPACT OF THAT REVISION as well as considerations for developers contemplating the purchase or development of real property that contains or is likely to contain regulated wetlands. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am
SB 264 is being challenged by an Orlando real estate firm and four Chinese citizens, with the U.S. government filing a brief in their support (Shen v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
” The City can approve TDRs between parcels within the IBC, allowing unused DIV budget allocations to be moved from one site to another without increasing the IBC’s total, overall development intensity budget. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
A principal of zoning since the United State Supreme Court upheld an early zoning ordinance in 1926 (Village of Euclid v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In 1974, the County adopted a rezoning measure that reduced how many residences Martha could build on its property. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
His interview with one of them was telling. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 8:46 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
In 2010, the real parties applied for a design permit, planned development permit (PDP), tentative map, general plan amendment, and rezoning to build 40 residential units on the parcel. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
Department of Agriculture has recognized that heirs’ property has been the leading cause of Black involuntary land loss in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
The Project and Its Background Real Party Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) owns two large parcels of land in Martis Valley (unincorporated Placer County) between Truckee and Lake Tahoe; a 1,052-acre parcel on the west side (West Parcel), and a 6,376-acre parcel on the east side (East Parcel) of state route (SR) 267. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
The award of final decision-making authority was not “dramatically unlike” the relief requested, as decision making is part and parcel to legal custody. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm
” The stated purpose of the ASTM Standard E1527-21 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment process is “to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. [read post]
